I am not a woman of letters, at least
not in the formal sense of that phrase, but I am a woman who writes letters,
and this past February I signed in with InCoWriMo (International Correspondence
Writing Month) to have my own experience of what my husband found so enjoyable the
year before.
I am a part of that generation where
letter writing was the only means of distance correspondence. Yes, there were
phones. I’m not that ancient. But if you had a father that limited the
household to 5 minute long distance phone calls, you were and remained
basically a letter writer. In truth, the most exciting time of my day at
university was mail call, when you went to your mail box to see if anyone had
written to you. And nothing felt so treasured at the letter or letters you
carried to your dorm to read in delicious solitude.
In fact, Bert and I started our relationship
via letter, preceded by
only two short conversations over a weekend when he
spoke once in Vancouver. We wrote for 3 ½ years, filling seven journals,
particularly exploring the Vietnam War due to its impact on both of us. They
were marvelous, honest conversations, for when you are writing in a journal,
there is no taking it back or hitting delete. That correspondence blossomed
into friendship, then love and ultimately marriage. How’s that for the power of
the pen.
In InCoWriMo, I am meeting many
interesting people from all over the world. A soul-sister in Massachusetts, a
young Israeli lad living on a Moshav, a Rabbi scholar from my birth city,
Philadelphia, PA, and a Welshman with a great sense of humor, to mention a few.
Yes there are days Bert and I both grimace when the mailman comes. Our stack of
unanswered letters waxes and wanes, but when it gets depth to it, we each hope
for a day without mail.
Nothing in this digital world, for
me, can take the place of letter writing which came back graphically when
one woman I write to, a gal of extensive writing talent which generates captivating
letters, sprained her thumb and had to type her letters for a while. There was
no interesting handwriting, no doodles while thinking, no lovely colors or the
artistry of various fountain pen nibs, no afterthoughts running vertically in
the margins, no sense of the moment that writer was in, their struggles, their
passion, their frustrations. Just black type on white paper. Even if she had
chosen to use colored, fancy fonts, it still wouldn't be her spilling out on
the page, lining out words that got ahead of her thinking, caret-ing in words
that got lost in a flurry of thoughts, adding art to the page in caricatures or
pen and ink drawings. Nor is there any way to explain the sense of connection hand
written letters engender that typing cannot even touch.
Recently, I found this marvelous
book which I bought as a gift for Bert. In all honesty, the gift did have the
flavor of buying your father a wagon for his birthday, but… The book is
entitled Letters of Note compiled by
Shaun Usher. Shared letters such as the ones found in it are like treasured
secrets whispered in your ear. Elvis Presley to U.S. President Richard Nixon;
Louise Armstrong to Lance Corporal Villec; Ray Bradbury to Brian Sibley; The
Connell Family to the Ciulla Family; Kurt Vonnegut to Charles McCarthy. Three
hundred and forty of them in all. Here are bits of three of them that gave me
pause.
Francis
Crick to Michael Crick, his twelve-year-old son at boarding school – March 19,
1953
The letter relates his jubilant news
of his co-discovery of the “beautiful” structure of DNA, the most important scientific
discovery of modern times accompanied by drawings he made to help his son
visualize it. He ends this letter with:
Read
this carefully so that you understand it. When you come home, we will show you
the model.
Lots of love,
Daddy
Flannery
O’Connor to a Professor of English who wrote and asked her to explain her short
story A Good Man is Hard to Find, for
which his class was struggling to find an acceptable interpretation – March 28,
1961
O’Connor’s last two paragraphs
conclude in this manner:
The
meaning of a story should go on expanding for the reader the more he thinks
about it, but meaning cannot be captured in an interpretation. If teachers are
in the habit of approaching a story as if it were a research problem for which
any answer is believable so long as it is not obvious, then I think students
will never learn to enjoy fiction. Too much interpretation is certainly worse
than too little, and where feeling for a story is absent, theory will not
supply it.
My
tone is not meant to be obnoxious. I am in a state of shock.
Flannery
O’Connor
Richard
Feynman, world class physicist and Nobel Prize winner to his wife who is dead –
October 17, 1946
The last paragraph and the P.S.:
…I’ll
bet you are surprised that I don’t even have a girlfriend (except you,
sweetheart) after two years. But you can’t help it, darling, nor can I—I don’t
understand it, for I have met many girls and very nice ones and I don’t want to
remain alone—but in two or three meetings they all seem ashes. You only are
left to me. You are real.
My
darling wife, I adore you.
I
love my wife. My wife is dead.
Rich
P.S.
Please excuse my not mailing this—but I don’t know your new address.
......
Have someone out there you love, you
miss, you've left along the way and regret it? Go clean out that dried up old
fountain pen, get some paper that can handle ink, and do yourself a great and
loving favor. Write a letter.